John Sempill (-April 1579)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1
Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
Robert Sempill (around 1505-around 1574/75), 3. Lord Sempill
Mother:2Elizabeth Carlile (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:36 March 1564-65Mary Livingston (-after April 1579)
Marriage contract dated 3 March 1564-65.
Children
Children with Mary Livingston:
Sir James Sempill (-)4
Arthur Sempill (-)5
John Sempill (-), Captain6
Dorothy Sempill (-)7
Attributes
Events
Died:8April 1579
Died:925 August 1579
Personal Info
He was legitimated as above in 1546, seems to have gone to France in 1560. He is described as 'an Englishman born'. As John Sempill of Beltries, he was called as one of the substitutes in the conveyance which his father made of his estates on 8 November 1572. The Regent Morton is said to have coveted the aftermentioned lands granted by Queen Mary, and to have endeavoured to reduce the gift. Having used intemperate threats, Sempill was arrested on a suspicion of conspiring against the life of the Regent, and on being tortured with the boot, confessed. He had certain jewels and furs belonging to Queen Mary and was imprisoned in Blackness because he would not deliver them to the Earl of Lennox. On 15 June 1577 he was convicted of treasonably conspiring for the slaughter of the Earl of Morton, the Regent.10
He and his wife had a grant from Queen Mary, 20 March 1564-65, of the lands of Over Drumdelgie and others in the barony of Strathbogie, on the forfeiture of the Earl of Huntly, but in 1567, Huntly having been restored to the lands, they got instead the Island of Little Cumbrae and others.11
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Sempill, p. 538-51, III Robert.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume V: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1908), Linlithgow, p. 435-39, V Alexander Livingston.
4 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Sempill, p. 538-51, III Robert.
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume V: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1908), Linlithgow, p. 435-39, V Alexander Livingston.
9 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Sempill, p. 538-51, III Robert.
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.