Mette Kistine Ellingsdatter Skaug (1732-1825)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:11763Hans Ørbech (1742-1805)
Children
Children with Hans Ørbech:
Mette Ørbech (-)2
Åsta Ørbech (-)3
Anna Nagel Ørbech (-)4
Maren Ørbech (-)5
Kristine Ørbech (-)6
Elen Kristine Ørbech (-young)7
Dominicus Ørbech (1775-1837)8
Elling Hanssen Ørbech (16 November 1783-young)9
Attributes
Events
Born:101732
Died:111825
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Dagfinn Krossen, Bygdebok for Årdal Band 3: Slektsbandet (: Årdal kommune, 1985), Natvik p. 25, III Dominikus Hansson Ørbech og Åsta Johanne Kristoffersdotter f. Lemvik.
2 Dagfinn Krossen, Bygdebok for Årdal Band 3: Slektsbandet (: Årdal kommune, 1985), Natvik p. 25-26, IV Hans Dominikusson Ørbech og Mette Kristine Ellingsdotter f. Skaug.
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Kåre Ragnar Nilsen, Renathe-Johanne Wågenes, Statsarkivet i Bergen, "Ministerialbok for Lærdal prestegjeld 1783-1804 (1422P)", database, Digitalarkivet (http://digitalarkivet.no : ), hd00000001727503.
10 Dagfinn Krossen, Bygdebok for Årdal Band 3: Slektsbandet (: Årdal kommune, 1985), Natvik p. 25, III Dominikus Hansson Ørbech og Åsta Johanne Kristoffersdotter f. Lemvik.
11 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.