Jan Jostsen Pagedorn (-1681)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Mother:1Anne Agnete Cramers (-after 1681)
Spouses and relationship events
Marriage license:228 March 1674Catharina/Karen Corneliusdatter de Lange (-1713)
Married:313 May 1674Catharina/Karen Corneliusdatter de Lange (-1713)Nykirken [Unknown/Unspecified], Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Married:413 May 1674Catharina/Karen Corneliusdatter de Lange (-1713)Nykirken [Unknown/Unspecified], Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Children
Attributes
Events
Born:5Wildenbrück, Westfalen (North Rhine-Westphalia [state], Germany [country])
Burgess:630 November 1674Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
as merchant.
Died:71681Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Probate:81681
Buried:926 September 1681Korskirken [Unknown/Unspecified], Bergen [city/town], Bergen kommune [municipality], Hordaland [Unknown/Unspecified], Norway [country]
Personal Info
He had no issue.10
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 A. M. Wiesener, "Slegten de Langes ældre led i Bergen: ," Bergens historiske forening. Skrifter. 38 (1932): 379-418, VI, p. 402-13.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 , "Ministerialbok for Nykirken prestegjeld 1668-1820 (1308M8)", Database, Digitalarkivet (https://www.arkivverket.no/digitalarkivet : ), hv00000000109727.
5 A. M. Wiesener, "Slegten de Langes ældre led i Bergen: ," Bergens historiske forening. Skrifter. 38 (1932): 379-418, VI, p. 402-13.
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.