William Gordon of Terpersie (-)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Mother:1Margaret Stewart (-after 1541)
Father:2
Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
James Gordon of Lesmoir or Coldstone (-June 1558), 1. Laird of Lesmoir
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3(Unknown) Ogilvy (-)
Children
Children with (Unknown) Ogilvy:
George Gordon of Terpersie (-1634)4
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
William Gordon was at the battle of Corrichie with his chief, 28 October, 1563, and, ten years thereafter, was with Adam Gordon, Laird of Auchindown, at the battle of Tillyangus, where he killed Black Arthur Forbes, brother of Lord Forbes, and champion of that surname and family. He was with the said Adam Gordon at the battle of Craibstone, near Aberdeen, and was with him also at the bourd of Brechin, where the said Adam was still victorious. He built the House of Terpersie, and cast a ditch about it hard on the marches betwixt him and Lord Forbes. Mr. William Gordon was forfaulted along with his chief, the Earl of Huntly, and others of the name of Gordon, for the part they took at Corrichie. He died at the House of Rannes in the Enzie, and was honourably interred in the church of Rathven.5
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 John Malcolm Bulloch, The House of Gordon vol. II: (Aberdeen: The New Spalding Club, 1907), p. (162-79), James Gordon I. of Lesmoir.
2 Ibid
3 Rev. William Temple, The Thanage of Fermartyn: Including the District Commonly Called Formartine, its Proprietors, with Genealogical Deductions; its Parishes, Ministers, Churches, Churchyards, Antiquities, &c (Aberdeen: D. Wyllie & son, 1894), p. 93-105, Rothienorman, Kinbruin, and Badenscoth.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.