Elizabeth Hay (-)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Spouses and relationship events
Married:1Walter Barclay of Towie-Barclay (-before 25 April 1587)
Children
Children with Walter Barclay of Towie-Barclay:
Patrick Barclay of Towie (-June 1589)2

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
William Barclay (-), professor of Humanity
3
Lilias Barclay (-)4
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
She was probably of the family of Hay of Delgaty.5
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage, and Knightage, Clan Chiefs, Scottish Feudal Barons, Volume I: 107th Edition (: Burke's Peerage and Gentry LLC, ), Barclay of Towie Barclay and of that Ilk, Chief of Barclay, p. 252-54.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.