Anne Paulsdatter Ånnerud (-1690)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1
Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
Paul Ånnerud (-1660 or later), farmer
Spouses and relationship events
Married:2Jakob Torsen (-around 1663), farmer
Married:3Kristoffer Gulbrandsen (around 1631-after 1701), farmer
Children
Children with Jakob Torsen:
Tor Jakobsen Ånnerud (1660-1736)4
Children with Kristoffer Gulbrandsen:
Jakob Kristoffersen Ånnerud (-)5
Kristoffer Kristoffersen Ånnerud (1665-1718), farmer6
Attributes
Events
Died:71690
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Eyvind Lillevold, Aurskog og Blaker 2: (: Bygdeboknemnda for Aurskog og Blaker, ), Ånnerud, p. 123-28, Ånnerud søndre.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.