Janet Elphinstone (16 March 1534-5-around 1599)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Alexander Elphinstone (1510-10 September 1547), 2. Lord Elphinstone
Mother:2Catherine Erskine (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3Robert Leslie of Ardersier and Findrassie (probably around 1519 or 1520-22 September 1588), 1. Laird of Findrassie
Married:41590Alexander Bruce of Earlshall (-)
Between 15 August and 17 November 1590.
Children
Children with Robert Leslie of Ardersier and Findrassie:
Robert Leslie of Findrassie (-)5
George Leslie of Burdsbank (-)6
John Leslie (-)7
Joanna Leslie (-)8
Agnes Leslie (-)9
Attributes
Events
Born:1016 March 1534-5
Died:11around 1599
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Rothes, p. 281-92, IV George Leslie.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Elphinstone, p. 531-34, II Alexander Elphinstone.
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1910), Rothes, p. 281-92, IV George Leslie.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.