Sophie Amalia von Zweibrücken (15 December 1646-30 November 1695)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Friedrich (5 April 1616-9 July 1661), Herzog von Zweibrücken
Mother:2Anna Juliane von Nassau-Saarbrücken (8/18 April 1617-29 December 1667/8 January 1668)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:327 July/November 1678Siegfried (-26 April 1684), Graf von Hohenlohe-WeikersheimMeisenheim [city/town], Bad Kreuznach [county], Rhineland-Palatinate [state], Germany [country]
Married:430 May 1685Johann Karl (17 October 1638-21 February 1704), Pfalzgraf von Birkenfeld zu GelnhausenWeikersheim [city/town], Main-Tauber [county], Baden-Württemberg [state], Germany [country]
Children
Children with Johann Karl:
Magdalene Juliane von Zweibrücken-Birkenfeld (26 February 1686-5 November 1720)5
Attributes
Events
Buried:6Gelnhausen [city/town], Main-Kinzig [county], Hesse [state], Germany [country]
Born:715 December 1646Zweibrücken [city/town], Rhineland-Palatinate [state], Germany [country]
Died:830 November 1695Gelnhausen [city/town], Main-Kinzig [county], Hesse [state], Germany [country]
Personal Info
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Charles Cawley, Medieval Lands - version 4 (http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CONTENTS.htm : ), Palatinate.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.