Philip de Setun (-)


Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property person::$quality is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/person.php on line 281

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Alexander de Seaton (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:2Alice or Helen (-)
Married:3Matilda Corbet (-)
Children
Children with :
Sir Alexander de Seton (-)4
Thomas de Seton (-)5
Emma de Seton (-)6
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
He had from King William the Lion a charter of confirmation, granted at Stirling between 1177 and 1185, of the lands of Setune, Wintune and Winchelburgh, which had been his father's. Maitland states that he died in the fourteenth year of King William, i.e. in 1178 or 1179; but he seems to have witnessed a Crown charter which cannot be assigned to an earlier date than 1184.7
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Winton, p. 560, Alexander de Seaton.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Dunbar, p. 251-52, IV Waldeve.
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Winton, p. 560-61, Philip de Setun.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.