William de Elphinstone (-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir William Elphinstone (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:2before 6 November 1421Margaret Hepburn (-)
Children
Children with :
Henry Elphinstone of Pittendreich (-)3
Sir Alexander Elphinstone (-10 September 1435)4
William Elphinstone (-30 June 1486), Archdeacon of Teviotdale5
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
He is stated in the charter of 1397 to have been in the retinue of Sir William Lindsay of the Byres all his life. In consideration of this he had a grant from Lindsay of the lands of Pittendreich, co. Stirling. This charter of 1397 was not confirmed until 4 March 1423-24, at which time the grantee was still alive.6
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Elphinstone, p. 526-27, William Elphinstone.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume IX Index: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1914), p. 84, Elphinstone, "p. 527".
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Elphinstone, p. 527, William de Elphinstone.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.