Sir Colin Campbell of Glenorchy (around 1406-1475)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir Duncan Campbell of Lochow (-1453), 1. Lord Campbell
Mother:2Margaret Stewart (-)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:3probably 1448Jonet Stewart (-)
Married:4before 27 October 1467Margaret Stirling (-)
Children
Children with Jonet Stewart:
Sir Duncan Campbell of Glenorchy (-9 September 1513)5
Patrick Campbell (-)6
Children with Margaret Stirling:
John Campbell of Lawers (-9 September 1513)7
George Campbell (-)8
Mariot Campbell (-)9
Helen Campbell (-)10
Children with Margaret or Marie Robertson:
John Campbell (-15 July 1510), bishop of the Isles11
Margaret Campell (-)12
Attributes
Events
Born:13around 1406
Died:141475
Buried:1526 September 1475Kilmartin [parish], Argyll [county], Scotland [country], United Kingdom [country]
Personal Info
He is the ancestor of the Breadalbane family.16
Sir Colin married several times, but authorities vary so much that it is not easy definitely to state how often, in what order, or when the respective wives died, and by which of them he had issue. According to Nisbet, Sir Colin Campbell's first wife was Mary, one of the daughters of Duncan, Earl of Lennox, and he gives as his authority a contract of marriage said to be still extant in the archives of the Breadalbane family. There appears to be a mistake in the lady's name and designation, as Duncan, the last Earl of Lennox, executed 1425, had three daughters, his co-heirs, who were all married in 1392, several years before the birth of Sir Colin Campbell, and no daughter of Duncan, Earl of Lennox, called Mary appears on record. The Black Book of Taymouth states (p. 10) that Sir Colin married as his first wife 'Mariott Stewart, dochtir to Walter Stewart off Albanie (sone to Isobell, Duches off Albanie and Countess of Lennox).' Whether Sir Colin ever was married to this lady, whoever she was, is not without doubt.17
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Argyll, p. 330-32, I Duncan Campbell.
2 Ibid
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Breadalbane, p. 174-78, Colin Campbell.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
10 Ibid
11 Ibid
12 Ibid
13 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Argyll, p. 330-32, I Duncan Campbell.
14 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Breadalbane, p. 174-78, Colin Campbell.
15 Ibid
16 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume I: (: David Douglas, 1904), Argyll, p. 330-32, I Duncan Campbell.
17 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume II: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1905), Breadalbane, p. 174-78, Colin Campbell.
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.