Joanna Menteith (-)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1Sir John Menteith of Rusky (-around 1323)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:2probably around 1323Malise of Strathearn (-around 1328), 7. Earl of Strathearn
Married:31325 or laterJohn Campbell (-19 July 1333), Earl of Atholl
Married:4around July 1339Maurice Moray of Drumsargard (-), Earl of Strathearn
Married:5before 9 November 1347William Sutherland (-before 1389), 5. Earl of Sutherland
The William and Joanna had a dispensation, of date 9 November 1347, on the following grounds. They petitioned that Joanna had been married to John, Earl of Atholl, and Maurice Moray. That after the death of the latter. Earl William and she, ignorant that any impediment existed between them which should hinder their marriage, contracted matrimony per verba de presenti; but they afterwards learned that they were related doubly in the fourth degree of affinity, because William, John, and Maurice were related in the fourth degree of consanguinity, in consequence of which William and Joanna could not, without a dispensation, remain in marriage. They therefore petitioned accordingly. This shows that they had been married for some time before November 1347, so that the Princess Margaret had died not long after 30 March 1346.
Children
Children with Maurice Moray of Drumsargard:
Joanna Moray (-probably before August 1409), Lady of Drumsargard6
Children with William Sutherland:
Robert of Sutherland (-1442), 6. Earl of Sutherland7
Kenneth Sutherland of Forse (-)8
Attributes
Events
Personal Info
Joanna, after marrying the Earl of Sutherland, in writs granted by herself always styles herself as of Strathearn and a widow, but in writs by others, especially safe-conducts to England, she is styled Oountess of Sutherland, the latest of these being dated in March 1366-67. It is not known when she died.9
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Strathearn, p. 251-52, Malise.
2 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Douglas, p. 157-65, Archibald Douglas.
3 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume VI: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1909), Menteith, p. 130-33, V Mary.
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, volume III: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1906), Douglas, p. 157-65, Archibald Douglas.
7 Sir James Balfour Paul, Lord Lyon King of Arms, The Scots Peerage Founded on Wood's Edition of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland Containing an Historical and Genealogical Account of the Nobility of that Kingdom, Volume VIII: (Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1911), Sutherland, p. 325-29, V William.
8 Ibid
9 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.