Sophie Ulriksdatter Sandberg til Baggesvogn (11 September 1587-24 November 1649)

Same as
Additional names
Parents
Father:1
Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property attribute_do::$changedby is deprecated in /var/www/geneapedia.org/public_html/include/attribute_do.php on line 48
Ulrik Sandberg til Kvelstrup, Bøgested og Løistrup (23 March 1552-29 September 1636), rittmester "ved den ålborgske fane"
Mother:2Birgitte Maltesdatter Sehested (22 February 1560-1594)
Spouses and relationship events
Married:327 April 1623Enevold Kruse til Tulsted (-17 August 1626)Viborg [city/town], Nørlyng Herred [municipality], Ommersyssel [county], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Children
Attributes
Events
Buried:4Sindal Church [building], Sindal Sogn [parish], Vennebjerg Herred [Unknown/Unspecified], Vendsyssel [Unknown/Unspecified], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Born:511 September 1587Kvelstrup [Unknown/Unspecified], Tved Sogn [parish], Mols herred [municipality], Åbosyssel [county], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Died:624 November 1649Baggesvogn [Unknown/Unspecified], Sindal Sogn [parish], Vennebjerg Herred [Unknown/Unspecified], Vendsyssel [Unknown/Unspecified], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Funeral:715 December 1649Ålborg [city/town], Fleskum Herred [Unknown/Unspecified], Himmerland [Unknown/Unspecified], Jylland [Unknown/Unspecified], Denmark [country]
Personal Info
She was raised by her mother's sisters, Lisbet and Anne Maltesdatter, and thereafter by Anne's daughter Karen Lunge8
Groups
Issues

Sources

1 , Danmarks adels aarbog 1901: (: , 1901), Sandberg, p. 443-51.
2 Ibid
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
5 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid
certainlyThe information is supported by primary sources.
probablyThe information is supported by secondary sources which is most likely based on primary sources.
possiblyIt is unclear if the secondary source cited is based on primary sources, or the information is an assumption well supported by other evidence.
likelyThe information is only found in secondary sources with questioned quality, or there is a reason to suspect the information is wrong. Or the information is a likely assumption based on other evidence.
apparentlyThe information is doubtful and poorly documented, but still most likely correct.
perhapsThe information might be correct or it might be wrong. It is not supported by any trustworthy sources. It might me an assumption.
disprovedThe information is proven to be wrong.